![]() If you just want something for 100-200USD it is easy to find usable lenses. The most expensive lens on this list, the 300mm f/2. OIS is not needed so much in portrait photography. Canon EF 300mm f/2.8L IS USM II Super Telephoto Lens. If you invest in 56f1,2 you should pay 100-200 extra for the APD model. ![]() This multi-purpose lens is an excellent choice for general everyday shots. there is just ONE existing and superior portrait lens. The Tamron 28-75mm f/2.8 Di III VXD G2 is a top-notch and well-rounded lens that’s perfect for beginners. ![]() Cheap lenses are good for the price n this class.īut if you want to use a Fujifilm camera with all functionality and the best lens with fast AF - and you want also the best bokeh at f 1,2-f 2 and also good sharpness there is. 1 Soap Bubble Bokeh by Trioplan 2 Soap Bubble Bokeh 5 Vintage Lenses 2.1 Super Takumar 105mm F2.8 (M42 mount) 2.2 Fujinon 55mm F2.2 (M42 mount) 2.3 Meyer-Optik Domiplan 50mm F2.8 (M42 mount) 2.4 Pentacon AV (Diaplan) 80mm F2.8 (Projector Lens) 2.5 Pentacon AV (Diaplan) 100mm F3.5 (Projector Lens) 2. Usually the so called normal lenses = 50mm are quite sharp and acceptable bokeh. Get that swirly bokeh effect and a fast prime lens for 20-40 My video on adapting lenses and tuning the image stabilization. If you want a rather good manual focus and no OIS portrait lens that is typically 50mm f 1.4 - for 100-300 USD - the shops are full of old lenses from Canon, Nikon, Minolta or whatever brand. This discussion thread is something that i do not and can not follow anymore. Hope everyone can stay on-topic, I really need your inputs Was kinda disappointed to see that the majority of posts on this thread have already gone way off-topic. Aimed squarely at enthusiast photographers, the 85mm f 1.8G is a fast lens that produces great images with minimal distortion and flare. A local store here in my country have some Minolta 50 1.4 for sale and a 58 1.4, do any of you here have experiences with these lenses? They're relatively cheap compared to my other options and only cost about $100 each and all are in like new condition. I'm particularly intrigued on how cheap Minolta lenses are. Currently looking at Nikon AIS, Minolta, Canon FD. The 18-55 is always good in a pinch, but of course you can't open it up as much for nice you so much for the input and for staying on-topic Yes the Fuji 56mm f/1.2 is what I am certainly eye-ing for but I just want to know if there are other options that are okay budget-wise.Ĭurrently looking for vintage lenses now, dunno what came over me but I'm suddenly looking up LOTS of vintage lenses to use as portrait lenses. Even so, it’s nicely made, with n autofocus system based on a stepping motor, which gives smooth, ultra-quiet transitions ideal for movie capture, and the mounting plate is metal rather than plastic. One of the Best: Leica APO Summicron 35mm F2. This Canon full-frame compatible 50mm prime is really cheap. I like the 16 for environmental portraits. We Tested Them All Its Beautiful, But It Has Issues: Fujifilm GF 80mm F1. get the 50-140 F2.8, which is a fantastic lens to use for portraits. The 56 and 90 are the best Fuji portrait lenses.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |